Dr. Michael Stone: The Psychopathology of ‘Evil’ Children

Posted: October 28, 2013 in Behaviour, Biology, Ethics, Evil, Psychology, Science, Society
Tags: , ,

Dr. Michael Stone, a Forensic Psychiatrist from Columbia University, is perhaps best known in popular culture as the the host of the Discovery Channel show, ‘Most Evil’.  In ‘Most Evil’, Stone developed and employed a ‘scale of evil’ which took into account a number of factors with the aim of categorizing perpetrators of heinous crimes.

Exactly how one defines evil is hugely problematic and depends on your theological, philosophical and sociological stance, as well as your understanding of psychopathology.  We have increasingly become uncomfortable, and I would argue for very good reasons, in applying the term ‘evil’ to describe an individual as opposed to a set of behaviours and moral choices.

And this vexed issue becomes particularly relevant when it applies to children. In Dr. Stone’s ‘Big Think’ contribution entitled ‘The Psychopathology of Evil Children’, he explains that a very small percentage of children express callous and unemotional (CU) traits which consist of a persistent pattern of behavior characterised by a disregard for others and a lack of empathy.  Although these traits and associated behaviours cannot be ‘cured’, there are behavioural and pharmaceutical approaches that can, albeit to a very limited degree, ameliorate the negative effects explains Dr. Stone.  This raises the interesting question of whether we can identify a neurochemistry or genetics of  ‘evil’ as Dr. Stone seems to suggest; my own thoughts are that this reductionist approach is not likely to yield all the answers we need.  Moreover, the prospect, and indeed practice, of branding children as intrinsically ‘evil’ does not sit easily with me and may even be counterproductive.

 You can watch Dr. Stone’s ‘Big Think’ interview here:

 

Advertisements
Comments
  1. cabrogal says:

    Forensic psychiatrists sure are keen to jump on (or whip up) social vilification bandwagons, aren’t they?

    I think I need to write a post on the ‘The Psychopathology of Evil Pseudo-Scientists’.

    Like

  2. I’ve Ƅeen eliminated for a while, Ƅut now I remember the
    reason why I useԀ to adore this website. Тhanks, I am
    going to try and check right back more often. How frequently would you revise your
    site?

    Like

  3. It’s really hard to keep a website fascinating
    sometimes, but you appear to be controlling the content very
    comfortably. In fact you make it appear easy. Therefore is there an art
    to this or are you really just an all natural?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s